Mastering Unit Tests: Balancing Necessity and Efficiency - Codimite (2024)

Mastering Unit Tests: Balancing Necessity and Efficiency

Mastering Unit Tests: Balancing Necessity and Efficiency - Codimite (1)

software developmenttestingunit tests 3 min read

Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Copy Link

Unit testing is a key step in making sure parts of a program works right by itself before putting it all together. However, many developers wonder when they should use unit tests, when they can skip them, and how many tests are enough. In this article, we'll answer these questions and show you how to use unit testing effectively. We'll discuss when to test, how much testing is needed, and the benefits of doing it right. This will help you make better software and avoid problems later on.

Why test at all?

Mastering Unit Tests: Balancing Necessity and Efficiency - Codimite (2)

Testing each part of your program separately might seem like extra work, but it's actually a powerful way to catch mistakes early. When you test the small parts, you make sure they work correctly on their own. This means fewer problems when these parts come together to make the full program. Testing helps you find and fix errors without affecting the whole system, saving you time and effort in the long run. It also ensures that your software is reliable and works as expected, which is crucial for user satisfaction and trust.

Additionally, in a large code base, unit tests make things easier when refactoring. Because if the tests are in place, we can make changes with confidence. Running these tests helps e>sure that the existing unchanged parts of the code won't break, maintaining the integrity of the software even as it evolves.

How many tests are enough?

Mastering Unit Tests: Balancing Necessity and Efficiency - Codimite (3)

The main goal of unit testing is to catch logical errors. Therefore, generally, you should focus on adding unit tests to those parts of your code where logic is heavily involved.

For example, the following image shows a typical web server that receives some data, processes it, and saves it in a database.

Mastering Unit Tests: Balancing Necessity and Efficiency - Codimite (4)

The image illustrates the flow of data through a typical web server system. It shows three main steps:

  • Decode data: Here, incoming traffic, such as user requests or data, enters the system and is decoded into a usable format.
  • Processing: This is where the decoded data is manipulated, calculated, or processed according to the server's logic or the application's needs.
  • Database: Finally, the processed data is stored in a database for future retrieval or use.

In the context of unit testing, only the middle step—Processing—is crucial to test. This is because it involves the core logic and calculations that can impact the functionality of the entire system. The idea isn't to test everything but to strategically test the parts that most likely need scrutiny. This approach helps you maintain a balance between thorough testing and development efficiency.

When to Skip Unit Tests?

Mastering Unit Tests: Balancing Necessity and Efficiency - Codimite (5)

While unit testing is crucial for ensuring software reliability and function, there are scenarios where it might be reasonable to skip unit tests, at least temporarily. One such scenario is when you are developing a proof of concept (PoC) or a prototype. In these cases, the goal is often to quickly validate an idea or demonstrate the potential of a project, rather than delivering a finished product. The focus is on speed and innovation, rather than on stability and scalability, which can make detailed testing less of a priority initially.

Similarly, in parts of your application that involve straightforward functionality or very little business logic, the benefit of unit testing may not justify the effort. For example, if a section of code is simply passing data from one layer to another without transformation, or if it involves standard library calls that are already well-tested by their developers, writing additional unit tests might not be necessary.

However, it's important to assess these decisions carefully. Skipping tests can save time initially but might lead to greater technical debt or bugs in later stages, especially as the project scales up or moves beyond the prototype phase.

Conclusion

Unit testing is a key element in software development, crucial for ensuring that components work independently before integration. While it's important to focus unit tests on areas involving complex logic, there are scenarios, like during prototype development, where it might be practical to skip testing to expedite the validation process.

In this article, we discussed when and how much to test, and when it might be okay to forgo it. Effective unit testing balances thorough scrutiny with development efficiency, aiding in building software that is robust yet adaptable to changes over time.

software developmenttestingunit tests 3 min read

Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Copy Link

Savina Weerasooriya

Devops Engineer

Mastering Unit Tests: Balancing Necessity and Efficiency - Codimite (2024)

FAQs

Why is unit testing hard? ›

Ans: Unit testing in OOP can be more challenging due to factors such as tight coupling between classes, reliance on stateful objects, and difficulties in accessing private or protected members for testing purposes.

Is unit testing enough? ›

Yes, testing your our code with unit tests is always a good idea, it provides evidence your code works and security on future changes, but there are disadvantages…

How much unit test? ›

Defining Unit Test Coverage:

There is no one-size-fits-all answer to the question of how much unit test coverage is enough. However, most experts agree that a good target is to have at least 80% code coverage.

Is too many unit tests bad? ›

They also help you write cleaner code. If you have a lot of tests for one function, it's probably a sign that it is doing too much and should be broken down into smaller, single-purpose functions. Unit tests written correctly should test the outcomes and error handling of functions.

What is the best way to study for a unit test? ›

Remember to not study the whole syllabus. For unit tests, the whole syllabus is not tested. It is not effective to study the whole syllabus since only a section of the curriculum will be tested. Students should identify what are the chapters or topics that they are being tested on.

What is the necessity of unit testing? ›

The main goal of unit testing is to ensure that each unit of the software performs as intended and meets requirements. Unit tests help make sure that software is working as expected before it is released. The main steps for carrying out unit tests are: Planning and setting up the environment.

Is unit testing easy? ›

We then explore the fact that not all code is created equal: some pieces of code might be easy to unit test, while others might be downright untestable. Understanding that difference is crucial: you can't achieve good code coverage without writing testable code.

Does unit testing require coding? ›

In contrast, unit tests run every time the code builds. They can be written as soon as any code is written and don't require any special tools to run. Unit testing is considered to be one of the most basic types of software testing.

How much percent is a unit test? ›

While there is no standard for unit testing, one number often cited in the testing world is 80%. "Eighty percent is what I usually see as the gating standard for code coverage in corporate shops," said Tim Ottinger, a senior consultant at Industrial Logic. "Any higher or lower than that is unusual."

What is a good unit test? ›

Good unit tests should be reproducible and independent from external factors such as the environment or running order. Fast. Developers write unit tests so they can repeatedly run them and check that no bugs have been introduced.

What are the basics of unit test? ›

A basic idea of unit testing is to break down the complex software system into manageable, testable units. By focusing on a small portion of the code, we can ensure that each part functions correctly in isolation before integrating them together.

Why unit testing is not enough? ›

Unit tests excel at isolating and verifying individual components, but they can miss the domino effect of failures across services. In a complex system, a seemingly minor issue in one service can trigger a chain reaction of errors in other services that depend on it.

Is unit testing tough? ›

Furthermore, unit testing can be difficult to write tests for legacy code. Legacy code is often poorly structured and difficult to understand, making it challenging to write tests that effectively cover all possible execution paths.

What should be avoided in unit testing? ›

A good rule of thumb is to test only the public interface and behavior of your unit, and not the internal implementation details. You should also avoid testing trivial or obvious code, such as getters and setters, unless they have some logic or side effects.

Why is unit testing harder in OOP? ›

The author mentions that since state is maintained in object oriented programming, it is harder to write unit tests. He also says that since functional programming doesn't maintain state (not always), it is easier to write unit tests.

Why is integration testing is harder than unit testing? ›

Integration tests are harder to write. Unit tests can be run in any order, or even simultaneously. Integration tests usually required a strict order and can't be run simultaneously.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Reed Wilderman

Last Updated:

Views: 6059

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (72 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Reed Wilderman

Birthday: 1992-06-14

Address: 998 Estell Village, Lake Oscarberg, SD 48713-6877

Phone: +21813267449721

Job: Technology Engineer

Hobby: Swimming, Do it yourself, Beekeeping, Lapidary, Cosplaying, Hiking, Graffiti

Introduction: My name is Reed Wilderman, I am a faithful, bright, lucky, adventurous, lively, rich, vast person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.